303 vs LR1154

A reviewed side-by-side decision based on form, fit, electrical specification and application limits.

Verdict
Same fit · different chemistry
Confidence
93%
Reviewed
2026-08-09
Same fit · different chemistry

303 and LR1154 share dimensions but not the complete specification

The physical envelope and nominal voltage are close, but chemistry changes from Silver oxide to Alkaline manganese dioxide.

Use only when the device maker explicitly approves both chemistry systems.

Specification303LR1154
Dimensions11.6 × 5.4 mm11.6 × 5.4 mm
Nominal voltage1.55 V1.5 V
ChemistrySilver oxideAlkaline manganese dioxide
RechargeableNoNo
Typical useAnalog watches, calculators, low-drain instrumentsToys, calculators, small lights

Why this verdict

  • The physical envelope matches.
  • Nominal voltage is close.
  • Chemistry and discharge behavior differ.

What to verify in the device

Check the original compartment label, the current manual, polarity, terminal style and whether the device explicitly permits a chemistry or rechargeable alternative.

Sources for these profiles

  1. International Electrotechnical Commission — IEC 60086-1:2026 — Primary batteries, general requirements

    Primary-battery nomenclature, form, fit, function, terminal and electrochemical-system framework.

  2. Energizer — Battery Replacement Guide

    Cross-reference codes and manufacturer guidance to replace the same size and type together.

  3. Duracell — Battery Cross Reference Chart

    Independent manufacturer cross-reference families and corresponding product numbers.

  4. Duracell — Battery chemistry technical bulletins

    Alkaline, lithium-manganese-dioxide, zinc-air and silver-oxide chemistry behavior.